Lower cut-off for upper limit of fasting plasma glucose: what
does it mean?
Franeková J.1, 4, Jabor A.2, Friedecký B.3, Kubíček Z.4
1Ústav klinické biochemie, Interní klinika, Fakultní nemocnice Ostrava 2Úsek laboratorních metod, IKEM Praha 3SEKK, spol s r. o., Pardubice 4Oddělení klinické biochemie Nemocnice Třinec-Sosna |
|
Summary:
Objective: Retrospective analysis of oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT). The aim was to evaluate the influence of
changed fasting glucose concentration on sensitivity and specificity of the detection oGTT results after 2 hours.
Setting: Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, Internal Clinic, Faculty Hospital Ostrava; Department of Laboratory Methods,
IKEM Praha; SEKK, Inc., Pardubice; Clinical Biochemistry Ward, Hospital Třinec-Sosna.
Methods: Analysis of 977 oGTT results (75 g of glucose). Concentration of glucose was measured in capillary blood
(according to practice before new recommendation of national societies). Three groups of oGTT results were defined as
follows: „N“, i. e., glucose 2 hours post load under 7.8 mmol/l, „IGT“, i. e., glucose 2 hours post load between 7.8 and
11.09 mmol/l and „DM“, i. e., glucose 2 hours post load 11.1 mmol/l and higher. Absolute and relative frequencies of
fasting glucose and post load glucose were evaluated. For oGTT results (N, IGT, and DM, respectively), sensitivities and
specificities were calculated for different cut-off of fasting glucose.
Results: There was significant number of increased post load glucose concentrations in patients with normal fasting
glucose. Fasting glucose 5.0 mmol/l (capillary blood) was connected with sensitivity to detect IGT+DM of 77 % and
specificity 60%; similarly for 5.5 mmol/l they were 65 and 78 %, respectively. Fasting glucose 5.0 mmol/l (capillary blood)
was connected with sensitivity to detect DM of 89 % and specificity 60 %; similarly for 5.5 mmol/l they were 79 and
78 %, respectively.
Conclusions: Decreased upper limit of fasting glucose is logically connected with increased sensitivity not only for
diabetes mellitus, but also impaired glucose tolerance. The specificity is still acceptable. Selection of higher cut-off
would be connected with decreased detection of patients requiring correct care. Decreased cut-off seems to be advisable
step to better diagnostics and care of patients with impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes mellitus. On the other
hand, the extent of changes in cut-off should be compared with many other factors. Authors recommend to evaluate
data from oGTT with glucose concentration measured in venous plasma i.e., with respect to updated guidelines.
Key words:
diabetes mellitus, oral glucose tolerance test, sensitivity, specificity.
|