Summary:
For monitoring skeletal effects of the antiresorption treatments it is advantageous to employ techniques
aimed to a quantitative assessment of specific aspects of quality of bone that respond most significantly
to the treatment and best reflect the mechanisms of action of the drug. It is recommended to employ surrogates
of risk of fracture, such as measurement bone mineral density using dual X-ray absorptiometry
and assessment of bone resorption using biochemical markers. Monitoring enables to identify patients
not responding to the treatment or are not adherent to treatments. The information provided by bone
mineral density may be further elaborated using the biochemical markers. The Least Significant Change
enables an appropriate clinical interpretation of the measurements.
Key words:
bone minerál, bone markers, monitoring, quality of bone
|