Pedal Bypass versus Percutaneous Transluminal
Angioplasty of the Crural Arteries
Staffa R., Leypold J, Vojtíšek B.*
II. chirurgická klinika FN u sv. Anny a LF MU Brno, přednosta doc. MUDr. J. Leypold, CSc.* Klinika zobrazovacích metod FN u sv. Anny v Brně, přednosta doc. MUDr. P. Krupa, CSc. |
|
Summary:
Diabetic foot syndrome in patients with atherosclerotic angiopathy of the crural arteries frequently develops
in critical ischaemia and gangrene. Revascularization then may be the only approach to limb salvage. In the
ongoing decade, pedal bypass grafting has become the method of choice for treatment of the most severe forms
of chronic critical leg ischaemia caused by obliteration of the crural arteries. However, in patients in whom
angiographic findings are favourable (short stenosis of the crural artery and the presence of suitable distal outflow
arteries), percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), with stent placement, if indicated, is preferred. In
multisegmental or diffuse disease or when PTA is associated with complications (occlusion or dissection) with
subsequent limb ischaemia, bypass surgery is the method of treatment. In this study, the group of 30 patients
undergoing bypass grafting showed 90% patency of the pedal bypasses at 12-month follow-up; in 18 patients
treated by PTA, the patency of crural arteries at 6 months after angioplasty was 78%. Since either method has
its advantage and disadvantages, an individual approach to each patient is recommended. In decision-making
on the basis of angiographic findings, PTA is not confronted with pedal bypass grafting but the two methods are
regarded as complementary in treatment of patients with crural artery disease.
Key words:
percutaneous transluminal angioplasty – crural artery disease – pedal bypass
|