LDL apheresis – evaluation of the results from 1000 performed procedures
Cermanová M. 1, Bláha M.1, Bláha V.2, Havel E.3, Vyroubal P.2, Zadák Z.2, Blažek M.1, Malý J.1, Mašín V.4
1Oddělení klinické hematologie II. interní kliniky, 2Klinika gerontologická a metabolická, 3Chirugická klinika Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové a Lékařské Fakulty v Hradci Králové Univerzity Karlovy, 4Katedra lékařské biofyziky Lékařské Fakulty v Hradci Králové Univerzity Karlovy |
|
Summary:
The aim of this study was to evaluate 1000 LDL-apheresis procedures performed in 9 patients with severe familial lipid
disorder. LDL-apheresis is a method of extracorporeal elimination of LDL-cholesterol, based on immunoadsorption and
used in severe hyperlipidemia patients, refractory to conventional treatment. Materials and methods: Blood cells separators
Cobe Spectra (COBE BCT, USA) were used to separate patient’s plasma. Immunoadsorption was performed by
means of ADA or Adasorb (Medicap, Germany) and columns LDL-Lipopak (Pocard Ltd., Russia). Before and immediately
after the procedure, blood samples were taken and serum levels of lipoproteins tested. Results: the average period
of treatment was 6.3 years, range 2.9 – 8.5. The number of aphereses performed per one patient was 111 ± 58. Average
interval between two procedures was 18.9 ± 9.5 days. One procedure takes 3.8 ± 0.5 hours. Average volume of processed
plasma was 6654 ± 968 ml, plasma volume per kilogram of body weight was 97 ± 26 ml/kg. Average plasma flow was 30
± 4 ml/min, average blood flow 67.7 ± 5.4. The ACD-A: blood ratio 1:22 was used. The average flow of ACD-A was 3.1
± 0.25 ml/min. Average ACD-A consumption per one apheresis procedure was 697 ± 118 ml. The average total cholesterol
decrease was 70 ± 7%, LDL-cholesterol 84 ± 8%, HDL-cholesterol 26 ± 7% and triacylglycerides 56 ± 19% during
one procedure. On the average 53.6 aphereses were performed per one pair of columns, range 11–109. One pair of
columns was used on average 35.9 month. The adverse events were mostly mild and represented by vaso-vagal events
and manifestations of citrate related toxicity. Conclusion: Our modification of immunoadsorption is effective, selective
and safe.
Key words:
LDL-apheresis, familial hypercholesterolemia, immunoadsorption, effectivity, side-effects
|