Objective: The American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) Classification of Physical Status is a widely ušed grading systém for the preoperative health of the surgical patient. The aim of the study was to assess the consistency of its use by the anaesthetists of several anaesthetic departments in the Czech and Slovák Republics. Design: Prospective, observational, multicentre, postál study. Setting: 4 Czech and 1 Slovák Departments of Anaesthesia. Materials and methods: A printed or electronic questionnaire was sent to 101 anaesthetists from 5 departments in the Czech and Slovák Republics. Their length of practice, qualification and attitude to the ASA Classification were recorded. The respondents were asked to ascribe ASA grades to 15 hypothetical patients. The stratified data were compared by statistical tests (chi-square, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis). Results: Ninety-one of the anaesthetists responded (90%). No difference between the departments was demonstrated. More than 90% of these anaesthetists ušed ASA classification routinely, 80% considered it useful and only 44% would like to change it. In no čase was there complete agreement on the ASA grade: in 2 patients the assessment was restricted to two of the five possible grades, in 7 cases to 3 grades and in 4 patients to 4 grades, respectively. Two cases were assigned all 5 ASA grades. The anaesthetists with higher qualification and longer practice tended to ascribe the patients to higher ASA groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion: During a simulation of common clinical scenarios the variation of individual anaesthetists assessments was unacceptably high. The ASA grade alone cannot be considered to reliably describe the physical status of the patient.

        Key words: American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) Physical Status Classification - anaesthesia -audit