Importance of Evidence of the Presence of Antichlamia
Antibodies in Sterile Wimen - Comparison of MIF and
ELISA
Mašata J., Řezáčová J., Sodja I. 1 Drbohlav P.
Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika VFN a 1. LF UK Praha, přednosta prof. MUDr. J. Živný, DrSc. 1 Státní zdravotní ústav, Praha, ředitel doc. MUDr. Jaroslav Kříž |
|
Summary:
Objective: The objective of our study was to evaluate possibilities of serum examination of inferti-
le women, particularly as a screening test of tubal damage, and comparison of two diagnostic
methods.
Design: Retrospective study.
Setting: The Department of Gynecology - Obstetrics of the General Teaching Hospital and the 1 st
Medical Faculty of the Charles University in Prague.
Methods: 528 women were included in the study, which were monitored at the 1 st Department of
Gynecology - Obstetrics from September 1993 to June 1997. The total group was divided into
infertile and fertile women (women before artifical termination of pregnancy and pregnant wo-
men app. 4 week before delivery). The group of infertile patients was further divided into sub-
groups, according to their diagnosis. For all women examined, two smears from cervix were taken
for antigen detection using a direct immunofluorescence method (DIF - DFA, Chlamyset Orion),
and using an immuno-enzymatic method (ELISA - Wellcozyme set, Murex). From a blood sample,
a level of IgA and IgG anti-Chlamydia antibodies was ascertained. For 200 sero-positive or anti-
gen-positive women, we performed tests of the serums preserved, using specific micro-immunoflu-orescence tests (MIF) (SeroFia, MRL, Labsystem Savyon). We determined prevalence of antigen,
IgA and IgG antibodies in individual groups and subgroups of women. We compared both sero-
diagnostic methods and determined prevalence of specific antibodies for individual species of
Chlamydia in the groups and sub-groups.
Results: A high prevalence of active Chlamydia infection (11%) was ascertained in the total group
of women. Occurrence of IgG anti-Chlamydia antibodies was statistically significantly higher in
the group of sterile patients, i.e. 63.5, compared to 49.5% in the group of fertile women. In the
subgroup of infertile women with tubal infertility factor, IgG anti-Chlamydia antibodies were
diagnosed in 92%, compared to 40% in case of groups with other causes of infertility. MIF method
has a lower sensitivity then ELISA. For women with tubal infertility factor, 90% of MIF IgG
positive serums are positive for Chlamydia trachomatis.
Conclusion: Chlamydia trachomatis is the most frequent agent of tubal damage. Species-specific
IgG antibodies would be a useful supplementary initial examination of infertile patients. In case
of positive results, a suspicion of tubal damage is high.
Key words:
tubal infertility factor, Chlamydia trachomatis, anti-Chlamydia antibodies specif ic for
|