The Incidence of Postoperative Residual Curarization in the Recovery
Room after Rocuronium Administration
Adamus M.1, Koutná J.1, Neoral Č.2
1Klinika anesteziologie a resuscitace, Fakultní nemocnice a lékařská fakulta Univerzity Palackého, Olomouc, přednosta: MUDr. O. Marek 2I. chirurgická klinika, Fakultní nemocnice a lékařská fakulta Univerzity Palackého, Olomouc, přednosta: doc. MUDr. Č. Neoral, CSc. |
|
Summary:
In 513 patients, we investigated residual curarization after general anaesthesia with rocuronium administered, without peroperative
neuromuscular blockade monitoring. On admission to the recovery room, the ulnar nerve was stimulated submaximally (30 mA) and the
evoked muscle response was quantified with accelerometry (TOF-Watch® SX, Organon). The postoperative residual curarization was
defined as a TOF-ratio < 0.9 and could be demonstrated in 174 patients (34 %). Compared to the group with adequate recovery, these
patients received larger rocuronium dose [45.4 (SD 13.2) mg vs. 40.4 (SD 14.3) mg, p < 0.01], less experienced anaesthesiologists conducted
their case [p < 0.01], shorter time had elapsed since the last rocuronium dose [58.4 (20.9) min. vs. 64.9 (27.2) min., p < 0.05], their
core temperature was lower [35.4 (0.6) °C vs. 35.8 (0.6) °C, p < 0.01] and on average, they received less neostigmine during anaesthesia
[0.26 (0.47) mg vs. 0.57 (0.71) mg, p < 0.01]. We conclude that it is necessary to antagonize residual block after rocuronium, especially
in the absence of perioperative neuromuscular monitoring.
Key words:
post-operative residual curarization – neuromuscular blocker – rocuronium – recovery room
|