Summary:
Pitfalls of contemporary ultrasonography are connected with two groups of possible
risks. The first of them is a biological risk, resulting from interaction of ultrasound
energy with tissue structures. The effectiveness of two main risk factors, heating and
cavitation, is expressed by means of two safety indices – thermal (TI) and mechanical
(MI) – which are displayed on the screen during examination. In this connection it is
necessary to bear in mind the increasing sensitivity of some tissues to ultrasound
resulting in certain ultrasound intensity constrains for obstetrics, paediatrics and
ophthalmology. The implementation of the carefulness principle (ALARA) ensures that
the total ultrasound energy is maintained below the level of its biological efficiency
while diagnostic information is preserved. Moreover this type of risk is permanently
monitored by several international organisations. However, less attention is devoted
to non-biological risks consisting in erroneous examination or in incorrect interpretation
of the final image. The reason consists in insufficient knowledge of topographic
anatomy and in unskilled manipulation with the scan head. Finally, some guidelines
for minimizing of possible risks in ultrasound imaging as well as in Doppler methods
are introduced.
Key words:
ultrasonography – biological and non-biological risks – ALARA principle –
safety indices
|