CzMA JEP Home page CZECH MEDICAL ASSOCIATION J. Ev. PURKYNĚ
Journals - Article
CzMA JEP Home page News About Assocation Publishing Division Medical Journals Searching Supplements Catalogue
 
  Česky / Czech version Č.S. Psychiat., 97, 2001, No. 7, p. 343-349
 
Comparison of Risperidone and Olanzapine from the Point of View of Efficacy, Tolerability and Treatment Costs 
Hrdlička M., Rosillon D., Duchesne I. a výzkumníci studie RODOS 

Dětská psychiatrická klinika 2. LF UK a FN Motol, Praha, přednosta doc. MUDr. M. Hrdlička, CSc. SGS Biopharma, Wavre, Belgium Department of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Janssen Research Foundation, Beerse, Belgium
 


Summary:

       The RODOS study is an international multi-centre retrospective study, based on analysis of the patient’s records in patients with schizophrenia, who were treated with risperidone or olanzapine. The objective of the project was to compare both medications from the point of view of administration, efficacy, tolerability, and costs of the treatment - all under the normal conditions of clinical practice. In the Czech Republic, the RODOS study was conducted in three centres, and there were 176 patients enrolled in total. In the risperidone group there were 93 patients, average age 36.9 ± 13.8 years. In the olanzapine group there were 83 patients, average age 31.7 ± 11.7 years. There were two significant differences between the risperidone and olanzapine group: the age of onset of the first symptoms (p = 0,0037) and the age on admission (p = 0,0054). The average daily dose of risperidone was 3.2 mg. The average daily dose of olanzapine was 13.9 mg. In the risperidone group 85% of respondents were reported, in the olanzapine group 86%. This difference was not significant. When the average time between the start of medication and the onset of its therapeutic effect was compared, it was shown that the onset of the therapeutic effect of risperidone was faster than of olanzapine (7.9 versus 10 days, p = 0.006). There were no significant differences between the two groups in occurrence of adverse effects. Pharmaco-economical analysis of the daily treatment costs was performed using analysis of variance with covariates. This method allowed for adjustment of the results to the baseline differences of both treatment groups. The adjusted price of the daily treatment dose of risperidone was 70.5 Czech Crowns (CZK). In the case of olanzapine it was 245.7 CZK (p = 0.0001). If all the medication used was evaluated, the price of daily treatment in the risperidone group was 81.5 CZK and in the olanzapine group it was 256.5 CZK (p = 0.0001). The results of this study suggest that while the efficacy and tolerability of both medications were comparable, the cost of treatment was significantly higher in the olanzapine group.

        Key words: atypical neuroleptics, risperidone, olanzapine, efficacy, dosage, adverse effects, pharmacoeconomics.
       

Order this issue

  BACK TO CONTENTS  
 
 
| HOME PAGE | CODE PAGE | CZECH VERSION |
©  1998 - 2008 CZECH MEDICAL ASSOCIATION J. E. PURKYNĚ
Created by: NT Servis, s.r.o., hosted by P.E.S. consulting, s.r.o.
WEBMASTER