Clinical Significance of Venoplasties in
Infragenicular Prosthetic Bypass Grafts
Mondek P.1, Slyško R.2, Tomka J.2, Šefránek V.2
1Oddelenie cievnej chirurgie, FN Nitra, Slovenská republika, primár MUDr. P. Mondek, Ph.D. 2Klinika cievnej chirurgie, Národný ústav srdcových a cievnych chorôb a.s., Bratislava, Slovenská republika, prednosta prof. MUDr. V. Šefránek, Ph.D. |
|
Summary:
Aims: Analysis of medium-term patency of prosthetic infragenicular bypass grafts with venoplasty of distal anastomosis and
evaluation of venoplasties in patients with critical limb ischemia.
Study design: A single centre, retrospective, non-randomised study.
Methods and Results: In 1998–2005, 42 patients with critical limb ischemias were surgically managed at our clinic using
infragenicular prosthetic bypass graft implantation with distal anastomosis venoplasty. 3 types of plasty were employed:
Linton‘s, St. Mary’s boot and Taylor‘s plasty. Mean follow-up period was 25 months and primary functionality was 69%. Longterm
functionality (over 5 years) was 35% and limb salvage rate was 38%. Functionality was assessed using life table analysis.
19% of patients exited during the follow-up period. In up to 30% patients, thrombolytic therapy was indicated for late bypass
occlusion with a success rate of 63%.
Conclusion: Prosthetic crural bypass is a relevant alternative to proximal level limb amputation. Venoplasty of distal anastomosis
increases volume of the anastomosis and compensates for incongruencies of the graft and recipient vein lumen. Based
on our experience, not a type of venoplasty, but a fact of increasing the anastomosis volume is most important. Whenever crural
reconstructions are indicated, patient’s quality of life, expected survival period, degree of patient’s independence prior to surgery
and patient’s compliance must be considered.
Key words:
critical limb ischemia – prosthetic bypass – venoplasty
|