Mechanical Ventilation at Paediatric Intensive Care Units
Fedora M.1,KošutP.1, BarnetováD.2,Fanta I.3,Hrdlička R.2,Kobr J.4,Prchlík M.5,Smolka V.6, Trávníček B.2 Vobruba V.7, Dominik P.1, Klimovič M.1, Šeda M.1, Marek L.1, Doleček M.1
1ARO a ECMO centrum FN Brno, Dětská nemocnice, Brno 2 Dětská JIRP ARK FN Ostrava 3 JIRP Dětské kliniky IPVZ Nemocnice České Budějovice 4 JIRP Dětské kliniky FN Plzeň 5 JIRP Kliniky dětské chirurgie a traumatologie 3. LF UK a FTNsP Praha 6 JIRP Dětské kliniky FN Olomouc 7 JIRP Kliniky dětského a dorostového lékařství VFN Praha |
|
Summary:
Objective: The aims of this study were to evaluate the incidence of mechanically ventilated children in participating units,
to find out the demographic data of the patients, to evaluate ventilator settings and to assess the mortality of ventilated
children.
Design: Prospective observational multicenter study between 1. 2. 2002 and 30. 4. 2002.
Setting: Seven paediatric intensive care units in tertiary hospitals in the Czech Republic.
Material and Method: All children between 0 and 18 years admitted to the participating paediatric intensive care units who
required intubation and mechanical ventilation were enrolled. Following parameters were recorded in all patients: demographic
data (age, weight, gender), the origin of the admitting diagnosis, severity of illness (Paediatric Risk of Mortality
Score – PRISM, Multiorgan System Failure – MOSF, Lung Injury Score – LIS), the origin of respiratory failure, presence of
chronic disease and immunosuppression, length of ventilation, length of stay, ventilator setting, the use of unconventional
ventilation, outcome (mortality), blood gas analyses and indices (alveoloarterial oxygen difference – AaDO2, oxygenation
index – OI, hypoxemia score – PaO2/FiO2 and ventilation index – VI) and dynamic respiratory system compliance (Cdyn).
Results: One hundred and forty four children (42% girls) were enrolled in total, which represented 23% of all admitted
children. The mean age of the patients was 70 months and mean weight was 23 kg. PRISM score and the length of stay were
twofold compared to mean values (11.7 vs. 5.7 and 10.4 vs. 4.8 days respectively). The mean length of ventilation was 117
hours, 66 % of the patients had an extrapulmonary origin of respiratory failure, 19% of the patients were chronically ill, and
0.7 % had the evidence of immunosuppression. The pressure regulated volume controlled and biphasic positive airway
pressure were the most frequently used ventilator settings. Both permissive hypercapnia and prone position were used in
8% of the patients and unconventional ventilation in all was used in 13% of the patients. The mortality was 3.5%.
Conclusion: Children on mechanical ventilation represent 23% of all patients admitted to paediatric intensive care units.
The severity of illness and length of stay were twofold compared to mean values and 66% of the patients had an extrapulmonaryorigin of respiratory failure.The pressure regulated volumecontrolled and biphasic positive airway pressure
were the most frequently used ventilator settings and unconventional ventilation was used in 13% of the patients. The
mortality rate was 3.5% and hypoxia was not a cause of death in any patient.
Key words:
mechanical ventilation – intensive care – children
|