Incidence of allergic glutaraldehyde colitis following
colonoscopic examinations – a retrospective and
comparative study
Pročke M., Keil R., Drábek J., Lochmannová J., Tyburec J., Hrdlička L., Šťovíček J., Chudý J.,Burešová M., Goláňová J.
Interní klinika 2. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice v Motole Úsek gastroenterologie – Endoskopické centrum Přednosta: Prof. MUDr. Milan Kvapil, CSc., MBA. |
|
Summary:
Aim: To determine the incidence of acute colitis following
colonoscopic procedure in our endoscopy unit and
prove the likely connection of this diagnosis with exposition
to glutaraldehyde.
Methods: We analyzed the medical records of the colonoscopic
examinations that were performed in our
endoscopy unit from 2001 through 2006 and selected the
cases of outbreak of acute colitis shortly after a colonoscopy.
Then we determined its incidence in each year and
compared the incidences between the years when 2%
glutaraldehyde solution had been used for colonoscope
disinfection and the years 2004–2006, when glutaraldehyde
solution was replaced by Electrolyzed Acid Water
(EAW) system.
Results: There were 4 537 patients examined through
2001–2003 when glutaraldehyde was being used for
endoscope disinfection, from which 27 experienced glutaraldehyde-
induced colitis (9, 8 and 10 respectively),
the overall incidence being 5,95 cases per 1000 patients
(6,5, 5,05 a 6,36 respectively). The average time between
the colonoscopy and the onset of symptoms was 2,3
days, the mean period being 2 days. Women were affected
more often (70,6 % vs. 29,4 %). In the period when
EAW system was being used (2004–2006), no single case
of acute colitis following a colonoscopy was found.
Conclusion: We can thus conclude that our patients
experienced glutaraldehyde-induced colitis.
Key words:
Colonoscopy, glutaraldehyde, colitis, EAW
system.
|