Percutaneous Treatment of Pancreatic Pseudocysts
Kašpar M.1, Hoskovec D.2, Beran T.3, Fára P.4, Adámek T.5, Vykus V.6
Radiodiagnostická klinika IPVZ a 1. LF UK, FN Na Bulovce, Praha1 přednostka prof. MUDr. J. Bohutová, DrSc. Chirurgická klinika IPVZ a 1. LF UK, FN Na Bulovce, Praha2 přednosta prof. MUDr. K. Antoš, DrSc. Anesteziologicko-resuscitační oddělení FN Na Bulovce, Praha3 Chirurgické oddělení Nemocnice Říčany4 Chirurgické oddělení Nemocnice Brandýs nad Labem5 Chirurgické odděleni Nemocnice Vysočany, Praha6 |
|
Summary:
Objective: The study was aimed for evaluation of successfulness and efficiency of longterm
percutaneous drainage in pancreatic pseudocysts.
Material and methods: Sixty four patients with resistant pseudocysts of the pancreas
demonstrated by contrast CT examination whose complaints were related to the pseudocysts
were treated with long-term percutaneous drainage. The size of the pseudocyst
was 5–7 cm in 22 cases, 8–10 cm in 30 cases, 10–12 cm in 7 cases and larger than
12 cm in 5 cases. The pseudocysts were divided according to classification of D’Egidio
and Schein into three groups: a postnecrotic type of the cysts I, a postnecrotic type of
the cysts II and a retention type of the cysts III.
Results: All patients (64) were treated with percutaneous drainage lasting from 3
weeks to 25 months. Sixty two patients with pancreatic pseudocysts were cured up,
and two pseudocysts were diminished to half of the original size. Undesirable effects
of the drainage were noted in two cases, the first being caused by bending of the drain
in the pseudocysts, where the treatment was interrupted, but the patient was cured
up due to fibrotic reconstruction of the pseudocyst, in the other case caused by infection
which penetrated into the pseudocyst from the colon, where the drain was installed
aiming at the pseudocyst, and the subsequent sepsis was treated with antibiotics
administered systemically as well as locally by injection needle directly into the pseudocyst
which was consequently cured up as well. Other undesirable effects, such as chrosepsis,
temperature and pain were not observed. It proved to be impossible to introduce
the catheter by the trocar way for marked fibrous changes caused by an inflammatory
process and the drainage was therefore repeated by the Seldinger method, which
made introduction of the drains possible.
Conclusion: The percutaneous drainage is a safe and efficient method for the treatment
of pancreatic pseudocysts in chronic pancreatitis. The authors noted only two
cases of complications caused by catheter, caused by bending of the catheter in the
pseudocyst in one and introduction of infection into the the pseudocyst in the other
case, both of them being finally cured up.
Key words:
chronic pancreatitis – pancreatic pseudocyst – cystic tumors of the pancreas
– percutaneous catheter drainage
|